奥巴马医改

VIP ¥
基础会员价 ¥
原价 ¥
VIP专享价 ¥
原价 ¥
开通VIP 免费下载更划算
开通VIP 立减¥ 立即开通
升级个人VIP 再减¥ 立即升级
已优惠¥
正在参加“买1得2”活动
购买后可立即查看,无需等待!
购买后可立即开票
订阅
On March 23, 2010, then-U.S. president Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act into law, otherwise known as ACA or Obamacare. At the time the health reform was introduced, nearly 50 million people had no health insurance – or one out of every six Americans. That was by far the most miserable performance among healthcare systems in developed countries. More surprising because the United States has the highest spending on health as a percentage of GDP , at almost 17 percent. For perspective, Australia’s health consumed around nine percent and Germany’s around 11 percent of their respective national GDPs. Per capita , the U.S. spent twice as much as comparable developed countries. The previous health coverage system also allowed insurers to refuse coverage for a person if they had a pre-existing condition. These factors led to a fragile healthcare system and an insecure life for many non-affluent people. Thus, it is no wonder that according to some surveys during 2008, over 80 percent of Americans demanded an overhaul of the healthcare system. Aims and accomplishments The main aims of the ACA are increasing access to affordable, quality healthcare and reducing the rising U.S. health expenditures. To achieve this, many health reforms were needed. These can be broadly categorized into reforms on healthcare coverage and access and reforms of the healthcare payment and delivery system. Most importantly the ACA expanded Medicaid eligibility, created health insurance exchanges (otherwise known as ACA marketplaces), mandated health insurance for all (or face a tax penalty), and protected those with pre-existing health conditions from being charged more or being refused coverage by insurance companies. As of 2021, roughly 31 million individuals now benefit from ACA-related enrollment in health care programs such as Medicaid or purchased from the Marketplace. Not only has this driven down the rate of uninsured, but numerous studies have reported the positive impact of Medicaid expansion . One such study estimated that just during the four years after 29 states expanded Medicaid, roughly 19.2 thousand lives were saved from treatable conditions (such as heart disease and diabetes). Another focus of health policy makers, before moving on to larger goals such as Medicare-for-all or single-payer systems, is reducing high cost-sharing and deductibles. Surveys show that while the share of uninsured has decreased, instead there is an increase of those who are insured but effectively underinsured because their out-of-pocket health costs are still too high and unaffordable compared to their income. Flaws A health reform as large as the ACA is of course not without its flaws. One of these is the Medicaid ‘coverage gap’. When the ACA was first written into law, it was expected that all Americans with household income up to 138% of federal poverty level (FPL) would receive coverage under Medicaid, thus only those earning between 100%-400% FPL were eligible for ACA marketplace subsidies (also known as premium tax credits). However, in 2012, the supreme court ruled that states were allowed to decide whether they will expand Medicaid or not, and currently (as of the end of 2021) 12 states still have not expanded Medicaid. Therefore, there are an estimated 2.2 million people in these non-expansion states that earn too much to be eligible for Medicaid in their state ( average eligibility is 40% FPL , or roughly 580 U.S. dollars per month for a household of two), but less than 100% FPL and therefore ineligible for marketplace subsidies. Moreover, without expansion, childless adults are also ineligible for Medicaid, no matter how low their income is, yet adults living alone represent the highest share of those uninsured . The Biden-administration is doing what it can to encourage the remaining states to expand Medicaid through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which provides further temporary fiscal incentives. Another issue is the ‘ family glitch ’. Under the ACA, employer coverage is deemed affordable if the employee’s share of the premium does not exceed 9.83 percent of the employee’s household income. However, even if coverage for the employee’s family costs more than 9.83 percent of household income — which is often the case — the employee’s family members are not eligible for marketplace subsidies as long as “self-only” coverage for the employee does not exceed this amount. Nevertheless, despite these pitfalls, one cannot dispute the positive impacts of the ACA mentioned above. Opposition and public opinion The ACA remains a much debated topic in the United States. Originally, even the term ‘Obamacare’ was used by opponents of the law in a pejorative way. Many conservatives see it as a governmental takeover of the healthcare system, portraying it in an un-American, unconstitutional, and even ‘socialist’ light. Opponents were willing to spend around 420 million dollars on TV ads to portray the law negatively , while only 27 million dollars were spent supporting the new law. For seven years, the republicans have campaigned the repeal and replacement of Obamacare, yet when they finally had the authority to execute their plans in 2017, they failed. This was largely due to opposing views within the party – because many republican legislatures actually liked parts of Obamacare such as the protection against preexisting conditions – and most importantly because of a lack of a clear replacement plan. Because in spite of its flaws, the ACA has indisputably achieved increased coverage and every republican plan so far would have decreased coverage while increasing premiums or deductibles for many. However, the Trump-administration did leave marks, such as rendering the individual mandate null, meaning there was no monetary punishment for people foregoing health insurance. This was thought to bring about the collapse of the ACA’s ‘three-legged stool’ approach. While there was indeed a rise in the percentage of uninsured after 2017 , overall, the system has held steady. Other laws enacted to decrease Medicaid advertisement funding or reduce the open-enrollment period among others, have also been slowly reversed by Biden’s administration. Since the beginning, public opinion about the health reform has been very mixed, although those seeing the ACA favorably has finally reached a stable majority. This text provides general information.
二手电商行业数据主题包
PPT格式3633
订阅
二手电商行业数据
PPT格式3633
订阅
二手电商行业数据
PPT格式3633
订阅
二手电商行业数据
PPT格式3633
订阅
二手电商行业数据
添加行业 下载PPT

添加当前行业为会员指定行业

即可下载行业PPT

订阅
二手电商行业数据
替换行业 下载行业PPT

替换当前行业为会员指定行业

即可下载行业PPT

订阅
二手电商行业数据
替换行业 下载行业PPT

当前已无替换次数

点击联系客服获取更多次数

订阅

选择 行业并开通会员

即可浏览本主题和所选行业内所有数据!

前往会员中心
选择会员套餐并选择行业
完成支付,即可浏览此行业内所有相关数据以及主题集

升级会员套餐并选择

即可浏览本主题和所选行业内所有数据!

前往会员中心
选择会员套餐并选择行业
完成支付,即可浏览此行业内所有相关数据以及主题集

您已开通会员

可浏览此行业的主题与数据

您已开通会员

可浏览本主题和基础数据库内所有数据

开通任意会员套餐

即可浏览本主题和基础数据库内所有数据
主题数据集
奥巴马医改
说明:
购买后可永久获得本数据集;提供打包下载,无需逐条下载,方便快捷。
价格:
899
299
600
299
899
相关推荐
媒体引用
资质证书
热点数据图
数据主题包图表报告形式呈现本主题所有数据
本数据主题包包括 中国化妆品行业 主题下的 33条 数据包含总体概述、化妆品核心数据、典型企业等数据。
3633
PPT、PDF下载
数据来源
价格:
899
数据主题包图表报告形式呈现本主题所有数据
本数据主题包包括 中国化妆品行业 主题下的 33条 数据包含总体概述、化妆品核心数据、典型企业等数据。
3633
PPT、PDF下载
数据来源
您已开通此行业VIP,
可免费下载
数据主题包图表报告形式呈现本主题所有数据
本数据主题包包括 中国化妆品行业 主题下的 33条 数据包含总体概述、化妆品核心数据、典型企业等数据。
3633
PPT、PDF下载
数据来源
您已购买本数据主题包
数据主题包图表报告形式呈现本主题所有数据
本数据主题包包括 中国化妆品行业 主题下的 33条 数据包含总体概述、化妆品核心数据、典型企业等数据。
3633
PPT、PDF下载
数据来源
您未开通本行业,升级并开通可免费下载
引言:ACA之前的高未保险率
{isPay=0, isHaveRight=1, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074737, is_end=1, name=1997-2021美国没有医疗保险的人数, id=44452601, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176772}
1997-2021美国没有医疗保险的人数
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074738, is_end=1, name=1997-2021美国没有医疗保险的人口百分比, id=44452602, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176773}
1997-2021美国没有医疗保险的人口百分比
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074739, is_end=1, name=美国拥有任何医疗保险的美国人百分比, id=44452603, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176774}
美国拥有任何医疗保险的美国人百分比
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074740, is_end=1, name=1997-2021美国未享受医疗保险的人口比例, id=44452604, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176775}
1997-2021美国未享受医疗保险的人口比例
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074741, is_end=1, name=至2021,按贫困水平划分的美国成年人没有医疗保险的比例, id=44452605, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176776}
至2021,按贫困水平划分的美国成年人没有医疗保险的比例
展开全部数据
当前图片:医疗补助扩展与非扩展状态
{isPay=0, isHaveRight=1, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074742, is_end=1, name=2010-2021按医疗补助扩展状况分列的美国无医疗保险成年人所占份额, id=44452608, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176777}
2010-2021按医疗补助扩展状况分列的美国无医疗保险成年人所占份额
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074743, is_end=1, name=U、 2010-2021按医疗补助扩展状况划分的美国成年人公共健康保险, id=44452609, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176778}
U、 2010-2021按医疗补助扩展状况划分的美国成年人公共健康保险
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074744, is_end=1, name=U、 2010-2021按医疗补助扩展状况划分的拥有私人医疗保险的美国成年人, id=44452610, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176779}
U、 2010-2021按医疗补助扩展状况划分的拥有私人医疗保险的美国成年人
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074745, is_end=1, name=按医疗补助扩展状态划分的美国未参保儿童分布和比率, id=44452611, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176780}
按医疗补助扩展状态划分的美国未参保儿童分布和比率
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074746, is_end=1, name=截至2021 1月,按州扩展状态划分的医疗补助收入资格限制为FPL%, id=44452612, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176781}
截至2021 1月,按州扩展状态划分的医疗补助收入资格限制为FPL%
展开全部数据
当前图片:改进领域
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074747, is_end=1, name=医疗补助覆盖缺口中未参保的美国成年人数量, id=44452615, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176782}
医疗补助覆盖缺口中未参保的美国成年人数量
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074748, is_end=1, name=美国成年人在医疗补助覆盖差距中的分布(按州), id=44452616, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176783}
美国成年人在医疗补助覆盖差距中的分布(按州)
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074749, is_end=1, name=未参保的美国成年人在医疗补助覆盖范围差距中的人数(按州), id=44452617, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176784}
未参保的美国成年人在医疗补助覆盖范围差距中的人数(按州)
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074750, is_end=1, name=美国“家庭故障”人数(按部分人口统计), id=44452618, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176785}
美国“家庭故障”人数(按部分人口统计)
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074751, is_end=1, name=美国人口中“家庭问题”的比例(按部分人口统计), id=44452619, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176786}
美国人口中“家庭问题”的比例(按部分人口统计)
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074752, is_end=1, name=美国救援计划自2021起取消ACA两年补贴悬崖, id=44452620, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176787}
美国救援计划自2021起取消ACA两年补贴悬崖
展开全部数据
ACA的积极影响
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074753, is_end=1, name=截至2021,发现医疗补助扩大产生积极影响的研究数量, id=44452622, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176788}
截至2021,发现医疗补助扩大产生积极影响的研究数量
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074754, is_end=1, name=2014-2021美国ACA相关入学人数, id=44452623, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176789}
2014-2021美国ACA相关入学人数
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074755, is_end=1, name=美国医疗补助扩大对死亡率的影响, id=44452624, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176790}
美国医疗补助扩大对死亡率的影响
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074756, is_end=1, name=美国各州医疗补助扩展对死亡率的影响, id=44452625, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176791}
美国各州医疗补助扩展对死亡率的影响
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074757, is_end=1, name=截至2020年,美国部分州通过扩大医疗补助计划实现的传统医疗补助储蓄, id=44452626, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176792}
截至2020年,美国部分州通过扩大医疗补助计划实现的传统医疗补助储蓄
展开全部数据
支付和交付改革:责任护理组织
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074758, is_end=1, name=医疗保险共享储蓄计划中的ACO数量, id=44452629, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176793}
医疗保险共享储蓄计划中的ACO数量
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074759, is_end=1, name=医疗保险共享储蓄计划中分配给ACO的受益人数量, id=44452630, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176794}
医疗保险共享储蓄计划中分配给ACO的受益人数量
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074760, is_end=1, name=医疗保险共享储蓄计划的ACO参与者人数, id=44452631, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176795}
医疗保险共享储蓄计划的ACO参与者人数
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074761, is_end=1, name=医疗保险共享储蓄计划中ACO的收入储蓄, id=44452632, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176796}
医疗保险共享储蓄计划中ACO的收入储蓄
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074762, is_end=1, name=医疗保险共享储蓄计划中ACO的联邦储蓄总额, id=44452633, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176797}
医疗保险共享储蓄计划中ACO的联邦储蓄总额
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074763, is_end=1, name=医疗保险共享储蓄计划中ACO的整体质量分数, id=44452634, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176798}
医疗保险共享储蓄计划中ACO的整体质量分数
展开全部数据
支付和交付改革:HRRP和HACRP
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074764, is_end=1, name=2022财年因高再入院率而受到医疗保险处罚的美国医院数量, id=44452636, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176799}
2022财年因高再入院率而受到医疗保险处罚的美国医院数量
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074765, is_end=1, name=2022财年因高再入院率而受到医疗保险处罚的美国医院数量(按年份), id=44452637, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176800}
2022财年因高再入院率而受到医疗保险处罚的美国医院数量(按年份)
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074766, is_end=1, name=2015-2022财年,美国医疗保险因高再入院率而受到处罚的医院数量, id=44452638, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176801}
2015-2022财年,美国医疗保险因高再入院率而受到处罚的医院数量
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074767, is_end=1, name=U、 2015-2021,美国医院医疗保险因医院获得性高条件而受到处罚, id=44452639, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176802}
U、 2015-2021,美国医院医疗保险因医院获得性高条件而受到处罚
展开全部数据
舆论
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074768, is_end=1, name=U、 美国对ACA的意见2010年4月至2021 10月, id=44452643, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176803}
U、 美国对ACA的意见2010年4月至2021 10月
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074769, is_end=1, name=批准或不批准ACA的美国成年人比例(按党派), id=44452644, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176804}
批准或不批准ACA的美国成年人比例(按党派)
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074770, is_end=1, name=U、 美国公众舆论:推翻ACA/Obamacare 2020,按党派划分, id=44452645, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176805}
U、 美国公众舆论:推翻ACA/Obamacare 2020,按党派划分
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074771, is_end=1, name=U、 美国舆论:推翻ACA 2020年之前存在的条件保护, id=44452646, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176806}
U、 美国舆论:推翻ACA 2020年之前存在的条件保护
{isPay=1, isHaveRight=0, isStop=0, nodeStat=0, objId=108074772, is_end=1, name=美国2020年1月关于医疗保健计划意图的公众意见, id=44452647, isNew=0, type=0, name_id=1176807}
美国2020年1月关于医疗保健计划意图的公众意见
展开全部数据